Explain This to Me

Before you read on, please read this article.

So the head football coach at Penn State hired a child molester as an assistant.  On a few occasions this child molester was witnessed... ummm... plying his perversion in the locker room.  There were actual witnesses who weren't children being raped, but innocent bystanders.

We come to find out that witnesses to the child raping told the head football coach and said head football coach told his superiors and then did nothing more.  The rapist assistant stayed on the payroll and kept taking kids to the shower.  That's the story as I understand it.

Yesterday the University fired the head football coach.

............And the students rioted.

So let me get this straight, students of Penn State...  Allowing a member of your staff to continue to rape children is not a riot worthy offense... but firing the football coach who allowed said member of his staff to continue to rape children is a riot worthy offense.

So the students of Penn State stand in favor of forcibly raping little children.

They may argue that their reasons for rioting were other than those that I have stated, but from where I stand I can't really see it any other way.  Allowing little kids to be raped is okay, according to all of you.  Getting fired for allowing little kids to be raped is worthy of a riot, according to all of you.  You, Penn State students, are in favor of child molestation.  You agree with the practice of raping kids.

Nice going, Penn State students.  Way to keep those priorities straight.  As you see it, college football is more important than not raping children.